A banana republic move
Aggregated Source: Imagethief
September 28, 2006|
To Singapore's lasting shame:
Bravo to FEER for sticking to its guns and not pulling the article, as they were requested to, not putting ransom money in escrow and not appointing a legal sacrificial lamb. Perhaps more foreign publications need to do the same thing.
I don't think it matters whether you agree with the article or FEER's editorial line or not. Singapore's government needs to find a more progressive way to deal with news coverage it doesn't like. Banning uppity publications and wrapping censorship in a veneer of noble legalism is beneath a country that should know better. On the heels of the woeful WTO affair, it isn't doing much for the city-state's international image. But, then, they don't care about such trivial things as image, do they?
Original URL: Click here to visit original article
Copyright Imagethief
Far Eastern Economic Review banned - in SingaporeThe article that got them in trouble is here.
Singapore (dpa) - Singapore revoked on Thursday approval for the Far Eastern Economic Review (FEER) to be sold or distributed in the city-state.
"It is a privilege and not a right for foreign newspapers to circulate in Singapore," said a statement from the Ministry for Information, Communications and the Arts.
FEER's Hong Kong-based publisher failed to appoint a legal representative and pay a 200,000 Singapore dollar ($129,000) bond, the statement said, referring to the Review Publishing Co. Ltd.
The publisher had "not complied by the September 11 deadline, nor has it complied till today, despite a reminder sent to FEER on September 14," the statement said.
"It becomes an offense for any person to sell or distribute or import or possess for sale or distribution" FEER in Singapore," it added.
Bravo to FEER for sticking to its guns and not pulling the article, as they were requested to, not putting ransom money in escrow and not appointing a legal sacrificial lamb. Perhaps more foreign publications need to do the same thing.
I don't think it matters whether you agree with the article or FEER's editorial line or not. Singapore's government needs to find a more progressive way to deal with news coverage it doesn't like. Banning uppity publications and wrapping censorship in a veneer of noble legalism is beneath a country that should know better. On the heels of the woeful WTO affair, it isn't doing much for the city-state's international image. But, then, they don't care about such trivial things as image, do they?
Original URL: Click here to visit original article
Copyright Imagethief
Print This Post
|
Email To Friend
(48 votes, average: 4.56 out of 10)