Aggregated China Media News & Blogs



Recent US-China Trade Numbers are Deceiving

Aggregated Source: China Challenges
April 10, 2007|

Business Week reports:

Sometimes Chinese economic data will surprise economists and traders by diverging slightly from consensus forecasts. Yet it is quite rare for the money pros to be off by $13 billion. That's pretty much what happened on Apr. 10, when China reported that its March trade surplus fell 38% year-on-year to $6.87 billion, while most economists were expecting a jump to $20 billion.

Coming at a time when U.S.-China trade relations have hit a nasty stretch, and U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab has just filed two formal complaints with the World Trade Organization alleging China is not doing enough to protect intellectual property, one might be tempted to view this as a promising development.

Not really, says Shanghai-based Standard Chartered senior economist Stephen Green. He thinks the falloff instead reflects the fact that Chinese exporters front-loaded a lot of international sales during January and February ahead of moves by Beijing to start reducing export-tax rebates on some Chinese products in March.

To read more:

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/apr2007/gb20070410_001614.htm



Original URL: Click here to visit original article
Copyright China Challenges
Print This Post Print This Post | Email To Friend

1 Stars2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars6 Stars7 Stars8 Stars9 Stars10 Stars

26 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 1026 Votes | Average: 5.42 out of 10 (26 votes, average: 5.42 out of 10)


No Comments Yet »

Your comment

The following HTML tags are permitted:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

RSS RSS Feed for Comments on this Post |